Studies of Pain, Stress, and Immunity

Jeffrey S. Mogil, Wendy F. Sternberg, and John C. LiebeskindDepartment of Psychology, Brain Research Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90024

HISTORICAL BACKGROUND

In 1969, Reynolds discovered that profound analgesia could be elicited by focal electrical stimulation of the medial brain stem of the rat (89). Soon after, we published our first article on so-called stimulation-produced analgesia (SPA) (69), in which we suggested that the CNS contained circuitry serving a natural role in pain inhibition, circuitry that also served as the endogenous substrate for opiate analgesia. In 1972, we provided evidence for the common mechanism of action of SPA and morphine analgesia by showing that the opiate antagonist, naloxone, caused a partial reduction in SPA (4) (see also ref. 5). The opiate receptor was discovered the next year (86), and the first of the opioid peptides was reported soon after that (42), launching the ``endorphin revolution'' and providing an apparent neurochemical basis for the hypothesized endogenous analgesia system.

SPA and opiate analgesia have been found to work by activating descending pathways from brain stem to spinal cord where pain inhibition actually takes place, although a role for ascending paths has also been adduced (76). Electrically stimulating or microinjecting opiate drugs into certain brain areas activates centrifugal controls on the flow of nociceptive information through spinal cord dorsal horn neurons that in turn project both to nociceptive reflex paths and to the brain. In other words, the brain can powerfully control its own pain input. Brain stem loci supporting both SPA and opiate analgesia include the mesencephalic periaqueductal gray matter (PAG) and several nuclei in the rostral ventral medulla whose projections descend via the dorsolateral funiculus to the dorsal horn and the nucleus caudalis (see ref. 10 for review).

The demonstration of high concentrations of opiate receptors and opioid peptides in areas of the CNS involved in pain inhibition further suggest that the endogenous opioids are likely mediators of SPA. In addition to its susceptibility to antagonism by naloxone, SPA manifests tolerance with repetition and cross-tolerance with morphine (68), meeting the three criteria for opioid mediation commonly used today.

To be credible, a natural pain inhibitory system must have natural stimuli that activate it. Under emergency conditions of fight or flight, pain inhibition may be more adaptive to the organism than pain perception itself, allowing the animal to focus attention not on pain but on strategies for defense or aggression (57). Three different groups demonstrated in 1976 that, indeed, noxious and/or fear-provoking stimuli can produce stress-induced analgesia (SIA), suggesting that stress is an important trigger for activating endogenous analgesia substrates (3,38,93). SIA has subsequently been demonstrated in a wide variety of animals, including humans, and can be elicited by a wide range of stressors (see ref. 47 for reviews).

SIA and SPA have been found to have many similar characteristics, supporting the view that stress is a natural trigger for endogenous analgesia systems in the brain. For example, both SPA and SIA can be mediated by at least two distinct neurochemical systems. SPA elicited from certain brain sites (e.g., ventral PAG) satisfies the three criteria for opioid mediation described above, whereas SPA from other brain areas (e.g., dorsal PAG) must be categorized as nonopioid (22). Likewise, certain stress paradigms produce opioid SIA, whereas, by application of these same criteria, SIA from certain other stress paradigms results in nonopioid SIA (106,114). In one study we showed that opioid forms of SIA manifest cross-tolerance with opioid SPA, suggesting that opioid SPA and SIA share a common opiate receptor site (105).

It has been shown for almost all SIA paradigms that by simply altering the parameters of the same stressor it is possible to elicit either opioid or nonopioid SIA. Specifically, we have found that within certain boundaries, and holding other parameters constant, less severe stressors (e.g., weaker or briefer inescapable footshock, rotation of shorter duration, or swimming in warmer water) cause opioid-mediated SIA, and more severe stressors (e.g., stronger or longer footshock, longer duration rotation, or swimming in colder water) cause nonopioid SIA (23,62,104,106). Yet the same duration and intensity of footshock that causes nonopioid SIA if presented continuously, causes opioid SIA if presented intermittently (53,106). The SIA substrate is even more complex; there are at least two different kinds of opioid SIA, one supporting learned helplessness and requiring consciousness and an intact pituitary-adrenal axis (``hormonal'' SIA), the other not (``neural'' SIA) (106,114).

Such studies have helped to reveal the multiplicity of mechanisms and pathways that can be differentially activated as a function of the specific parameters of the stressor. Different parameters of even the same stressor cause physiological reactions that differ not only neurochemically (opioid versus nonopioid) but also in terms of anatomical, behavioral, endocrinological, immunological, and even oncological criteria. Questions have remained regarding the specific neurochemical nature, anatomical loci, and functional significance of nonopioid mechanisms of analgesia.

CURRENT RESEARCH THEMES

Opiate drugs are routinely used in the management of cancer pain. Unfortunately, various problems can accompany their use. Opiate therapy can be associated with a number of unpleasant side effects, including constipation, sedation, nausea, and respiratory depression (44). Opiate drugs are also subject to tolerance and can cause dependence (19). Individual differences in sensitivity to opiates are marked; Lasagna and Beecher (52) found that approximately 33% of patients did not experience adequate pain relief from the standard dose of 10 mg morphine per 70 kg body weight, and 20% were still unresponsive to a 15-mg dose.

There are four themes being addressed by our current research that relate to the topic of this volume. Three of these seek to address one or another of the aforementioned shortcomings of opioid analgesics: (i) in an attempt to develop analgesic compounds that might not display the side effects associated with morphine-like drugs, we are at present investigating the neurochemical bases of nonopioid SIA; (ii) we are exploring the ability of a certain class of antagonists to prevent the development of tolerance to opioids; and, (iii) we are examining the genetic determinants of analgesia in an attempt to understand individual differences in the magnitude of the analgesic response.

A fourth major aim of our current research effort is to assess the deleterious effects of pain and stress on health-related end points. Specifically, we are examining the influence of pain and stress on immunological (natural killer cell activity) and oncological (tumor metastasis) criteria. Our findings in this area underscore the urgency of improving methods to alleviate the suffering of cancer patients, as it is becoming increasingly clear that pain is more than just a symptom but can itself be an aggressive disease, a significant pathogen that, if ignored, can have life-threatening consequences.

Mechanisms of Nonopioid Stress-Induced Analgesia

As mentioned above, the neurochemistry of nonopioid analgesia has remained unclear. Because nonopioid mechanisms of SIA and SPA are centrally mediated and just as powerful as opioid mechanisms, one might expect that elucidating the neurochemistry of nonopioid analgesia would lead to the development of analgesic drugs having the potency of opiates but lacking their unwanted side effects. It might be especially important to develop potent, centrally active, nonopiate analgesics for managing pain in cancer patients who, for genetic or other reasons, either are unable to benefit from opiate drugs or have intolerable side effects from them.

Recent studies have demonstrated the involvement of excitatory amino acids (EAAs; glutamate and aspartate) in endogenous pain inhibition (2,43). The EAA receptor subtype known as the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor has been specifically implicated in SIA; NMDA receptor antagonists have been found to attenuate morphine analgesia (43,58), as well as opioid SIA produced by conspecific defeat (100) and restraint (58).

Whereas relatively high doses of NMDA blockers were used in studies demonstrating antagonism of opioid analgesia, we find that a very low dose of the specific, noncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonist, MK-801 (dizocilpine; 0.075 mg/kg, i.p.), produces a selective attenuation of nonopioid SIA while not reducing morphine analgesia. This conclusion is based on two converging lines of evidence (62,63).

First, we have reported that MK-801 completely blocks swim SIA ([SSIA]; 3 min swimming in 20oC water) in the opiate receptor-deficient mouse strain CXBK. These mice, developed by recombinant inbreeding techniques and found serendipitously to display marked deficits in opiate binding, exhibit only nonopioid SSIA. MK-801 partially blocks SSIA in the opiate receptor-rich CXBH strain, as does naloxone. MK-801 and naloxone delivered together completely block SSIA in CXBH mice (63).

Second, in a recently published study (62), we compared the effects of the same low dose of MK-801 on SSIA in mice elicited by a 3-min swim at three different water temperatures. Consistent with earlier reports (20,25,79,104), we find that, holding other stress parameters constant, opioid mechanisms of analgesia seem to be triggered by less severe stress, in this case warmer water temperature (32oC), whereas nonopioid mechanisms are triggered by more severe stress, in this case lower water temperature (15oC). SSIA from an intermediate temperature (20oC) causes a mixed opioid/nonopioid analgesia, one partially blocked by naloxone. MK-801 powerfully blocked the nonopioid 15oC SSIA, had no significant effect on the opioid 32oC form, and in combination with naloxone completely blocked the mixed opioid/nonopioid 20oC SSIA (Figure 1) .

In both of these studies, 0.075 mg/kg (i.p.) MK-801 was found to be ineffective in attenuating analgesia produced by 10 mg/kg (i.p.) morphine sulfate. These experiments were performed using the hot-plate test as the algesiometric assay; we also have evidence that 0.075 mg/kg MK-801 blocks nonopioid SSIA in the formalin test (111), a model of tonic, inescapable pain. Thus, we believe we have provided powerful evidence that the effect of MK-801 at this low dose is largely specific to nonopioid forms of analgesia, suggesting a role for the NMDA receptor in such analgesic mechanisms. An EAA-containing pathway connecting two brain structures crucially involved in descending pain inhibition=mthe PAG and the nucleus raphe magnus=mhas been identified by anatomical (2,116) and electrophysiological techniques (116). Other evidence suggests that the neurotransmitters serotonin (45,91,92) and histamine (35) might also be involved in nonopioid analgesic circuitry.

Although, as noted above, MK-801 appears to antagonize nonopioid analgesia selectively, we have most recently observed that this drug powerfully blocks the analgesic effect of the selective k opioid agonist, U-50,488, without attenuating morphine analgesia in rats (48). That analgesia produced by U-50,488 is opioid in nature is demonstrated by its naloxone reversibility (112). However, clear differences between k and m analgesia have been noted (see refs. 41,71 for reviews), and k agonists have attracted considerable attention as novel (non-m) analgesic compounds due to their relative lack of side effects compared to m agonists (28). The demonstration that k analgesia as well has an NMDA component underscores the relevance of investigating NMDA mechanisms of analgesia.

Our findings, as is typical of the literature, were based on data obtained from adult male subjects. Interestingly, we have recently observed (74) that nonopioid SIA in female mice, although equipotent to that of males, is not NMDA-mediated. MK-801, at the same or even higher dose, is completely ineffective in attenuating 15oC SSIA (and the nonopioid component of 20oC SSIA) in females. However, ovariectomized female mice display the male pattern of sensitivity to MK-801 antagonism, which is abolished by estrogen replacement therapy. In male mice, whether intact or castrated, estrogen administration does not alter the sensitivity of nonopioid SSIA to MK-801 antagonism (74). Such findings lead us to believe that female mice possess an estrogen-dependent SIA mechanism specific to their gender, of as yet unknown neurochemical identity. The demonstration of sexually dimorphic mechanisms of endogenous pain inhibition raises the possibility that novel analgesic drugs developed on the basis of single-sex studies will be ineffective in the opposite sex. At the very least, the discovery of important qualitative sex differences in analgesic mechanisms highlights the necessity to consider gender as a critical factor in both basic and clinical research.

Because the NMDA antagonist MK-801 blocks nonopioid analgesia, it may be that EAA agonists will have clinical utility as analgesics. For several reasons, however, it may prove difficult to develop pharmaceuticals based on this premise. First, there is a large literature documenting the neurotoxic effects of EAA agonists, including glutamate itself (see refs. 75,94 for reviews). In fact, MK-801 and other NMDA antagonists are currently undergoing clinical trials for the treatment of neurotoxicity associated with ischemic, hypoxic, and traumatic insult (120). Second, NMDA receptors have also been shown to play a role in ascending mechanisms of pain transmission. Following spinal administration, NMDA agonists produce nociception (1), and antagonists cause analgesia (21,87). Moreover, the NMDA receptor appears to mediate the phenomena of ``wind-up'' and ``central sensitization'' seen in the spinal cord dorsal horn after repetitive C-fiber activation or peripheral injury (29,31,117). Due to the ubiquitous nature of EAA receptors in the central nervous system (27), it is not at all surprising that NMDA receptors are involved in pain perception as well as pain inhibition. Thus, whereas the use of EAA receptor ligands as analgesics may not be currently feasible, the study of EAA involvement in mechanisms of pain and analgesia is likely to be crucial to a full understanding of these processes.

Role of the NMDA Receptor in Morphine Tolerance

The mechanisms underlying the development of opioid tolerance have remained elusive. Researchers have been unsuccessful in demonstrating reliable alterations in opioid peptide levels or receptor affinity/density following chronic opiate administration (50). Thus, investigators have been forced to look elsewhere to explain opioid tolerance. We (see also ref. 109) have recently shown that the NMDA antagonist MK-801, at low doses similar to those that selectively attenuate nonopioid SSIA, also blocks the development of acute tolerance to morphine in rats without decreasing morphine analgesia per se. For example, as illustrated in Fig. 2 , four single daily injections of morphine (15 mg/kg, i.p.) administered concurrently with MK-801 (0.05 mg/kg, i.p.) significantly attenuated tolerance to a test dose of morphine on the 5th day (60). In this same study, the broad-spectrum EAA antagonist kynurenic acid, which blocks both NMDA and non-NMDA (kainate and AMPA/quisqualate) receptors, actually enhanced morphine analgesia during the tolerance induction phase, but still reduced tolerance to a test dose of morphine on the 5th day.

The phenomenon of tolerance may be at least partially due to associative factors, including state-dependent learning (59,99). Learning an association between environmental cues and the administration of morphine may result in the gradual development of antagonistic or compensatory responses to the anticipated effects of morphine, thus reducing the drug's effectiveness (7). It is conceivable, therefore, that the attenuation of morphine tolerance by MK-801 is due to its blocking associative learning; in fact, the NMDA receptor has been shown to be crucially involved in several forms of associative learning, including long-term potentiation (26) and Pavlovian fear conditioning (49).

We have recently reported that MK-801 can block opiate tolerance even when given 2 hours after each of the daily morphine injections during the 4-day tolerance induction period (61). By delivering the MK-801 after morphine analgesia has largely dissipated, the possibility that its effects can be attributed to state-dependent learning is reduced. In addition, we have most recently found that tolerance is blocked when morphine and MK-801 are given together once in sustained-release preparations (15). This paradigm is one claimed to minimize the opportunity for associative learning to occur (see ref. 110). Even when the test dose of morphine is given as many as 56 days later, much less tolerance is seen if the original dose of morphine was accompanied by MK-801. Thus, the NMDA receptor seems to play a significant role in nonassociative factors underlying the development of long-term opiate tolerance. In this same study (15), naloxone-precipitated withdrawal symptoms (teeth chattering, ptosis) were observed. If MK-801 had been given with morphine, however, teeth-chattering behavior was found to be attenuated, a finding that has been replicated and extended by another laboratory (40). The nonspecific EAA receptor antagonist kynurenic acid has also been demonstrated to attenuate morphine withdrawal symptoms (88).

In our study described above (15), we found that MK-801 potentiated morphine analgesia, as did kynurenic acid in an earlier experiment (60). Such findings offer the hope of developing drugs that can be safely used with opiates when given for pain control over many weeks or months (e.g., in the management of cancer pain). These drugs should not only prevent the development of opiate tolerance but may even enhance opiate analgesia while blocking tolerance, permitting still lower opiate doses to suffice.

Others have demonstrated the ability of cholecystokinin antagonists to prevent the development of opiate tolerance (32,46,82,103,113), and these antagonists as well are sometimes found to potentiate morphine analgesia (32,113). There have been reports attesting to the involvement of k opiate receptors (101,119), arginine vasopressin (118), norepinephrine (102), serotonin (36), and GABA (107) systems in tolerance development as well. Although investigators have been unable to document gross alterations in opioid receptor binding properties following chronic opiate administration, recent molecular evidence has suggested that tolerance may also be due in part to a ``functional decoupling'' of opioid receptors from their associated G proteins (see ref. 110 for review). As Trujillo and Akil (110) suggest, it is possible that this functional decoupling may be a result of an NMDA-mediated increase in intracellular calcium concentration, and in fact increases in intracellular calcium have been demonstrated in animals receiving chronic opiate administration (37,115).

Genetic Determinants of Analgesia

Large individual differences have been documented in the analgesic responses of animals and humans. Some persons, as mentioned earlier, are insensitive to morphine analgesia (52). Conversely, approximately 35% of human subjects obtain adequate pain relief from placebo (11,52). A better understanding of the causes of such variability should prove to be clinically useful. Of similar importance might be any insights resulting from genetic analysis into the anatomical locus and neurochemical identity of that portion of the SIA circuitry that determines the ultimate magnitude of the analgesic response.

There are a number of models available for use in studying the genetic determinants of a behavioral trait such as SIA. These models include the analysis of inbred strains, recombinant inbred strains, defined mutants, and selectively bred lines (14,98). In our laboratory we have been employing two such genetic models, on which we have conducted a series of studies on SPA, SIA, and morphine analgesia.

The most common approach to the genetic analysis of behavioral and drug-related traits is the characterization of inbred mouse strains (14,98). The use of such strains, however, involves the time-consuming process of breeding test crosses. A newer technique developed by Bailey (6) uses so-called recombinant-inbred (RI) lines, in which the F hybrid generation (F x F) from a cross between inbred strains (F) is ``fixed'' by repeated (>20 generations) sib matings. The first RI series, developed from a cross between C57BL/6 and BALB/c mice (the CXB series), has been extensively characterized with respect to opioid responses (14,34). Of all seven CXB RI strains, the extreme responders to a wide range of opioid phenomena are the CXBH (high) and CXBK (very low) lines, and these lines are now often studied in isolation. The CXBH and CXBK lines have been found to differ markedly in brain opiate receptor density, with CXBKs being lower and CXBHs higher than normal on this dimension (8). Likely due to this opiate receptor deficiency, CXBK mice have been found to display abnormally low morphine (8,77,80), acupuncture (85), and D-amino acid analgesia (24). Miczek and colleagues (70) have demonstrated that CXBKs display relatively low opioid-mediated conspecific ``defeat'' analgesia.

In our work with these RI strains, we have found that CXBK mice, while displaying normal levels of nonopioid SIA (4 min continuous footshock), do not display any opioid SIA (1 min continuous or 10 min intermittent footshock) whatsoever (78). We also have evidence that the SIA exhibited by CXBK mice following 3 min forced swimming in 20oC water, when present, is entirely of a nonopioid character and completely blocked by MK-801 (63,64). In addition, we have demonstrated that the threshold of SPA does not increase following naloxone pretreatment in CXBK mice as it does in the CXBH and the parental (C57BL/6 and BALB/c) strains (65). It can be concluded that, for SPA as well as for SIA, CXBK animals display only nonopioid analgesia.

Selective breeding, also known as artificial selection, is the most direct approach to studying the genetic determinants of a trait (33). Instead of examining serendipitous genetic rearrangements in inbred strains affecting the trait of interest (or, in the case of RI strains, producing and then examining them), by selective breeding one can specifically alter the frequency of those genes directly influencing that trait. It is important to note that genes are not being created, destroyed, or altered; the only effect of selection is to change the gene frequencies in a population (33,90). Beginning with Tolman's ``maze-bright/maze-dull'' rats (108), a number of artificial selection experiments in behavioral genetics have been successfully accomplished using rodents. Of specific relevance to analgesia are three selective breeding programs still in existence: the high/low autotomy rat lines of Devor and Raber (30); the high/low levorphanol analgesia mouse lines of Belknap et al. (13); and the high/low SSIA mouse lines of Panocka and colleagues (83).

We have been studying the lines of Panocka et al., which were bred specifically for high (HA) and low (LA) SSIA at a water temperature (20oC) and swim duration (3 min) producing a mixed opioid/nonopioid analgesia. The selection process of Panocka and colleagues began with 150 animals of the outbred Swiss-Webster line being tested for their analgesic response on the hot-plate test (56oC), using an arbitrary cut-off latency of 60 sec. Animals displaying postswim hot-plate latencies shorter than 10 sec were chosen to be the progenitors of the LA (``low analgesia'') line, and animals displaying latencies greater than 50 sec were chosen to be the progenitors of the HA (``high analgesia'') line. LA males and females and HA males and females, so defined, were bred in all successive generations using these same criteria. Figure 3 shows the progressing divergence of SSIA over the first 20 generations of selection. After only five generations, post-swim hot-plate latencies (measured 2 min after swim) in HA mice had increased by more than twofold (83) over randomly bred controls (C).

We have found that HA and LA mice differ from one another whether the SIA is opioid or nonopioid (62). SPA threshold is five times higher in LA than HA mice (66); the analgesic dose of morphine 100 times greater (84). HA mice display four times more analgesia following ethanol administration than LA mice (73). These are large and reliable effects. These findings suggest that genetic factors are very important in determining central nervous system mechanisms of pain control, their overall strength and their neurochemical bases.

We have conducted another study in this series that appears to be particularly exciting (72). Following mendelian logic, we have crossed HAs and LAs to make F hybrids (HA x LA), and then F hybrids (F x F), and backcrossed the F hybrids to the parental stock to make high (HA x F) and low (LA x F) backcrosses. All of these groups were tested for opioid (32oC), nonopioid (15oC), and mixed opioid/nonopioid (20oC) SSIA, and also for morphine analgesia (10 mg/kg, i.p.). Following 32oC swim or morphine administration, the two opioid phenomena assessed, the proportions of animals in each genetically segregating group (i.e., backcrosses and F hybrids) exhibiting the HA, LA, and F hybrid phenotypes are close to the values predicted by mendelian analysis if the magnitude of analgesia is determined by one or very few gene(s).

The true power of the genetic approach is that it can allow the localization (i.e., gene mapping), isolation, and ultimately cloning of the gene(s) underlying inherited traits. The genetic dissection of a trait by gene mapping is facilitated by use of an appropriate genetic model. According to Lander and Botstein (51): ``The ideal situation occurs when (a) the phenotypic difference between the strains is large compared to the ... within-strain standard deviation; (b) breeding experiments indicate that the number of effective factors ... is small; and (c) the strains are a result of selective breeding for the trait.'' Clearly, the HA/LA mice fit these criteria perfectly. It seems likely, therefore, that the powerful techniques of molecular biology can be profitably applied to the task of gene mapping and cloning, representing the first steps toward the eventual use of gene therapy for chronic pain syndromes.

Pain, Stress, and Cancer

In its 25-year history, our laboratory has been primarily concerned with understanding the endogenous mechanisms underlying the suppression of pain. Recently, however, we have begun to focus as well on reasons why the suppression of pain is of such critical importance. Pain is widely regarded as a problem due to the suffering that it can cause, but standard medical wisdom has always minimized the consequences of pain, avowing that ``pain can't kill.'' However, evidence from laboratory experiments has begun to accumulate showing that pain and stress can suppress immune function, accelerate the growth of tumors, and increase mortality after tumor challenge.

Working with rats, we have been studying the effects of stress on natural killer (NK) cell cytotoxicity and, in parallel, its effects on tumor growth. NK cells are a class of lymphocyte that, without prior sensitization, recognize and destroy virally infected cells and certain tumor cells, thus constituting a first line of defense against infectious diseases and playing a role of special importance in surveillance against cancer (39). We have used standard techniques and also developed new ones for assessing NK cell cytotoxicity in vitro and in vivo.

In our earliest work we found that intermittent footshock stress, which causes opioid SIA, suppressed NK cell cytotoxicity, whereas footshock of seemingly comparable severity (same intensity; same total shock duration, but applied continuously), which causes nonopioid SIA, did not (96). The suppressive effects of the opioid stress on NK cell activity were blocked by naloxone and mimicked by high (<20 mg/kg) doses of morphine given systemically (96). The same opioid stress, but not the nonopioid one, caused a higher rate of mortality in animals inoculated with a mammary ascites tumor (MAT13762B) (55). Among animals dying from the tumor, those given the opioid stress died sooner than those given the nonopioid stress or no stress. Again, an opiate antagonist blocked this effect (55), and a high dose of morphine mimicked it (54). Morphine's effect on NK cell activity is seen whether the cells are harvested from spleen, bone marrow, or blood, suggesting that this is a widespread effect visible in at least three major immune compartments (97). This suppressive effect of opiates on NK cells shows stereospecificity (i.e., levorphanol, but not dextrorphan, is active) (67). Furthermore, fentanyl and sufentanil (potent opiate drugs sometimes used clinically at high doses to induce opiate anesthesia) have effects similar to morphine in these assays at doses predictable from their analgesic potencies relative to morphine (12).

Morphine given intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.) suppressed NK cell cytotoxicity at doses of 20 mg or higher (95), and although this dose is high relative to the i.c.v. analgesic dose, this observation nonetheless suggests a central site of action for morphine's NK-suppressive effect. This conclusion is further supported by the finding that N-methyl-morphine, which does not cross the blood-brain barrier, is ineffective in altering NK cell killing ability when given systemically (95).

Such findings suggest the frightening conclusion that high doses of opiates, such as those often required in the long-term management of cancer pain, for example, are themselves responsible for increased morbidity and mortality. However, we have also reported that morphine's immunosuppressive and tumor-enhancing effects show complete and rapid tolerance (54); after just a few days of morphine administration, its effects on NK cells and tumors were no longer seen. In marked contrast, the immunosuppressive effects of opioid-mediated footshock stress did not diminish even after three weeks of stress administration (54). These findings suggest that not only is it safe to use opiate drugs to manage pain over extended periods even at high doses, but that it may be unsafe not to, since failing to manage the pain might itself be stressful and hence immunosuppressive and tumor-enhancing in a manner that would not be expected to show tolerance (see ref. 56).

Our most recent work in this area employs the MADB106 tumor line both as the radiolabeled target cell in the in vitro NK assay and also as the tumor whose metastatic spread in the lungs we measure in vivo three weeks after intravenous inoculation. The MADB106 tumor is syngeneic to the Fischer 344 rats we study and its metastatic development is known to be NK sensitive (9,17). Several groups, including ours, have shown that reducing NK activity by antiasialo GM or by selectively depleting large granular lymphocyte (LGL)/NK cells with the monoclonal antibody 3.2.3 (17) causes a vast increase in the number of MADB106 pulmonary metastases, an effect that can be prevented by the adoptive transfer of LGL/NK cells, but not other lymphocytes (9).

We find (18) that forced swimming, of a sort that produces nonopioid SIA, suppresses NK cell cytotoxic activity measured 1 hr after stress and causes a pronounced increase in the number of MADB106 pulmonary metastases if the tumor is injected at the same time. These immunological effects of swim stress are also insensitive to naloxone (18). Clearly, not all stressors affecting the immune system do so via opioid mechanisms. If animals are stressed 24 hr after tumor inoculation, no effect on metastatic growth is seen (17). We know that the MADB106 tumor is sensitive to NK cell activity only for 24 hr postinoculation. Taken together, these results suggest that stress can enhance tumor metastasis by suppressing NK cell cytotoxicity.

To provide more direct evidence for this suggestion, we have studied lung clearance of MADB106 tumor cells, a process fundamental in preventing lung metastases of this tumor. There is recent evidence that this process is largely controlled by NK activity. For example, selective depletion of LGL/NK cells, using the monoclonal antibody 3.2.3, causes a 100-fold decrease in lung clearance of the MADB106 tumor (16) and a similar increase in number of lung metastases (17). Studying the effects of swim stress on lung clearance and NK mediation of such effects, we found a fourfold stress-induced decrease in lung clearance in normal rats but no such stress effect in rats previously depleted of LGL/NK cells (16). These findings strongly implicate LGL/NK cells in mediating the effects of forced swimming on lung clearance and metastatic colonization. Validating the ability of this depletion method to distinguish between LGL/NK-mediated and non-LGL/NK-mediated effects, we showed in the same experiment (16) that a different in vivo manipulation caused similar effects in both normal and LGL/NK-depleted rats. Although it is always difficult to prove causation, we feel our results offer the most convincing evidence to date of a causal relationship between stress, NK suppression, and enhanced metastatic development.

We commend to others this MADB106 model as one permitting parallel in vitro/in vivo studies of immunologic and oncologic outcome variables that are, at the very least, closely interrelated. Until now our technique has required sacrificing the animal in order to measure NK activity. However, we are currently using a whole blood NK cytotoxicity assay in which 0.5 ml of blood is sufficient to assess NK activity. In this assay, NK activity is measured per ml blood without excluding any blood cells. Original serum can serve as the assay medium, preserving some of the hormonal changes induced by an in vivo manipulation; or it can be replaced by neutral artificial medium, as is the standard practice. This method enables us to track NK activity over time in the same animal from successively drawn blood samples. We have found that the whole blood assay better reflects in vivo levels of NK activity than the standard NK assay.

Finally, in ongoing work from our laboratory, Dr. G. Page is investigating in rats the effects of an experimental surgery (laparotomy) on both NK cytotoxicity against the MADB106 tumor and on the number of lung metastases measured three weeks after injection of this same tumor (81). The surgery is performed under halothane anesthesia; animals are allowed to recover from the anesthesia and to survive for at least 10 hr. At that time, they are either sacrificed in order to perform the NK assay or are inoculated with the tumor and sacrificed three weeks later for determination of number of lung metastases. The surgical/postsurgical experience appears to be an adequate stressor for causing NK suppression and enhanced metastatic growth compared to untreated or anesthesia-only controls.

Chapter 3 Table 1: Effects of morphine on the increased number of lung metastases of the MADB106 tumor induced by experimental laparotomy in rats
 

Anesthesia only
Anesthesia + surgery
Vehicle Morphine Vehicle Morphine
42 (± 5)a  40 (± 6)  70 (± 9)b  47 (± 8)
aMean (± SEM) 
bSignificantly different from all other groups, p<0.05. 
Data from ref. 81
 

Of special interest, Page is finding in this work that an analgesic dose of morphine delivered in a slow-release preparation during and immediately after the surgery is able largely to prevent these effects (see Table 1). It seems that the experience of pain, no doubt by triggering a robust stress reaction, can suppress NK cell activity and cause an experimental tumor to metastasize more rapidly (81). We believe these findings speak to the potentially critical importance of pain relief generally, and postoperative pain management specifically, for human health. Perhaps inadequately managed postsurgical pain will prove to be especially dangerous for patients with tumors that are in the metastatic phase of development. In sum, pain can apparently affect morbidity and mortality; contrary to popular belief, it seems that pain can kill (56).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We wish to thank Drs. Shamgar Ben-Eliyahu, Benjamin Kest, Przemyslaw Marek, and Gayle Page for their helpful comments on this manuscript, Jason Feingold for assistance in data analysis, and Jon Davis for assistance in literature search. These studies were supported by NIH grant NS07628 and an Unrestricted Pain Research Grant from the Bristol-Myers Squibb Company.

REFERENCES

  1. Aanonsen LM, Wilcox GL. Nociceptive action of excitatory amino acids in the mouse: effects of spinally administered opioids, phencyclidine and t agonists. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1987;243:9-19.
  2. Aimone LD, Gebhart GF. Stimulation-produced spinal inhibition from the midbrain is mediated by an excitatory amino acid neurotransmitter in the medial medulla. J Neurosci 1986;6:1803-1813.
  3. Akil H, Madden J, Patrick RL, Barchas JD. Stress-induced increase in endogenous opiate peptides: concurrent analgesia and its partial reversal by naloxone. In: Kosterlitz HW, ed. Opiates and endogenous opioid peptides. Amsterdam: Elsevier/North Holland, 1976:63-70.
  4. Akil H, Mayer DJ, Liebeskind JC. M;aaecanismes monoaminergiques impliqu;aaes dans l'analg;aaesie produite par stimulation du tronc c;aaer;aaebral chez le rat. J Physiol (Paris) 1972;65:185.
  5. Akil H, Mayer DJ, Liebeskind JC. Antagonism of stimulation-produced analgesia by naloxone, a narcotic antagonist. Science 1976;191:961-962.
  6. Bailey DW. Recombinant-inbred strains: an aid to finding identity, linkage and function of histocompatibility and other genes. Transplantation 1971;11:325-327.
  7. Baker TB, Tiffany ST. Morphine tolerance as habituation. Psychol Rev 1985;92:78-108.
  8. Baran A, Shuster L, Eleftheriou BE, Bailey DW. Opiate receptors in mice: genetic differences. Life Sci 1975;17:633-640.
  9. Barlozzari T, Leonhardt J, Wiltrout RH, Herberman RB, Reynolds CW. Direct evidence for the role of LGL in the inhibition of experimental tumor metastases. J Immunol 1985;134:2783-2789.
  10. Basbaum AI, Fields HL. Endogenous pain control systems: brainstem spinal pathways and endorphin circuitry. Annu Rev Neurosci 1984;7:309-338.
  11. Beecher HK. Measurement of subjective responses. New York: Oxford University Press, 1959.
  12. Beilin B, Martin FC, Shavit Y, Gale RP, Liebeskind JC. Suppression of natural killer cell activity in rats by high-dose narcotic anesthesia in rats. Brain Behav Immun 1989;3:129-137.
  13. Belknap JK, Haltli NR, Goebel DM, Lam;aae M. Selective breeding for high and low levels of opiate-induced analgesia in mice. Behav Genetics 1983;13:383-396.
  14. Belknap JK, O'Toole LA. Studies of genetic differences in response to opioid drugs. In: Harris RA, Crabbe JC, eds. The genetic basis of alcohol and drug actions. New York: Plenum Press, 1991:225-252.
  15. Ben-Eliyahu S, Marek P, Vaccarino AL, Mogil JS, Sternberg WF, Liebeskind JC. The NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801 prevents long-lasting non-associative morphine tolerance in the rat. Brain Res 1992;575:304-308.
  16. Ben-Eliyahu S, Page GG. The in vivo assessment of natural killer cell activity in rats. Prog NeuroEndocrinImmunol 1992;5:199-214.
  17. Ben-Eliyahu S, Yirmiya R, Libeskind JC, Taylor AN, Gale RP. Stress increases metastatic spread of a mammary tumor in rats: evidence for mediation by the immune system. Brain Behav Immun 1991;5:193-205.
  18. Ben-Eliyahu S, Yirmiya R, Shavit Y, Liebeskind JC. Stress-induced suppression of natural killer cell cytotoxicity in the rat: a naltrexone-insensitive paradigm. Behav Neurosci 1990;104:235-238.
  19. Benedetti C, Butler SH. Systemic analgesics. In: Bonica JJ, ed. The management of pain, vol 2. Malvern, PA: Lea & Febiger, 1990:1640-1675.
  20. Bodnar RJ, Sikorszky V. Naloxone and cold-water swim analgesia: parametric considerations and individual differences. Learning Motivation 1983;14:223-237.
  21. Cahusec PMB, Evans RH, Hill RG, Rodriquez RE, Smith DAS. The behavioral effects of an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist following application to the lumbar spinal cord of conscious rats. Neuropharmacology 1984;23:719-724.
  22. Cannon JT, Prieto GJ, Lee A, Liebeskind JC. Evidence for opioid and non-opioid forms of stimulation-produced analgesia in the rat. Brain Res 1982;243:315-321.
  23. Cannon JT, Shavit Y, Liebeskind JC. Rotation speed can determine whether the resulting stress-induced analgesia is blocked by naloxone. Ann NY Acad Sci 1991;467:425-427.
  24. Cheng RS, Pomeranz B. Correlation of genetic differences in endorphin systems with analgesic effects of D-amino acids in mice. Brain Res 1979;177:583-587.
  25. Chesher GB, Chan B, Whaite C. Stress-induced analgesia in mice. In: Peck CL, Wallace M, eds. Problems in pain. Sydney: Pergamon Press, 1980:34-46.
  26. Collingridge GL, Bliss TVP. NMDA receptors: their role in long-term potentiation. Trends Neurosci 1987;10:288-294.
  27. Cotman CW, Monaghan DT, Ottersen OP, Storm-Mathisen J. Anatomical organization of excitatory amino acid receptors and their pathways. Trends Neurosci 1987;10:273-280.
  28. Cowan A, Zhu XZ, Mosberg HI, Omnaas JR, Porreca F. Direct dependence studies in rats with agents selective for different types of opioid receptor. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1988;246:950.
  29. Davies SN, Lodge D. Evidence for involvement of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors in ``wind-up'' of class 2 neurones in the dorsal horn of the rat. Brain Res 1987;424:402-406.
  30. Devor M, Raber P. Heritability of symptoms in an experimental model of neuropathic pain. Pain 1990;42:51-67.
  31. Dickenson AH, Sullivan AF. Evidence for a role of the NMDA receptor in the frequency dependent potentiation of deep dorsal horn nociceptive neurones following C fibre stimulation. Neuropharmacology 1987;26:1235-1238.
  32. Dourish CT, Hawley D, Iversen SD. Enhancement of morphine analgesia and prevention of morphine tolerance in the rat by the cholecystokinin antagonist L-364,718. Eur J Pharmacol 1988;147:469-472.
  33. Falconer DS. Introduction to quantitative genetics. New York: Wiley, 1989.
  34. Frischknecht H-R, Siegfried B, Waser PG. Opioids and behavior: genetic aspects. Experientia 1988;44:473-481.
  35. Gogas KR, Hough LB, Glickl SD, Su K. Opposing actions of cimetidine on naloxone-sensitive and naloxone-insensitive forms of footshock-induced analgesia. Brain Res 1986;370:370-374.
  36. Gulati A, Bhargava HN. Brain and spinal cord 5-HT receptors of morphine-tolerant, -dependent and -abstinent rats. Eur J Pharmacol 1989;167:185-192.
  37. Harris RA, Yamamoto H, Loh HH, Way EL. Discrete changes in brain calcium with morphine analgesia, tolerance-dependence, and abstinence. Life Sci 1977;20:501-506.
  38. Hayes RL, Bennett GJ, Newlon P, Mayer DJ. Analgesic effects of certain noxious and stressful manipulations in the rat. Soc Neurosci Abstr 1976;2:1350.
  39. Herberman RB, Ortaldo JR. Natural killer cells: their role in defenses against disease. Science 1981;214:24-30.
  40. Higgins GA, Nguyen P, Sellers EM. The NMDA antagonist dizocilpine (MK801) attenuates motivational as well as somatic aspects of naloxone precipitated opioid withdrawal. Life Sci 1992;50:167-172.
  41. Horwell DC. Kappa opioid analgesics. Drugs Future 1988;13:1061-1071.
  42. Hughes J, Smith TW, Kosterlitz HW, Fothergill LA, Morgan BA, Morris HR. Identification of two related pentapeptides from the brain with potent opiate agonist activity. Nature 1975;258:577-579.
  43. Jacquet YF. The NMDA receptor: central role in pain inhibition in rat periaqueductal gray. Eur J Pharmacol 1988;154:271-276.
  44. Jaffe JH, Martin WR. Opioid analgesics and antagonists. In: Gilman AG, Rall TW, Nies AS, Taylor P, eds. Goodman and Gilman's the pharmacological basis of therapeutics, 8th ed. New York: Pergamon Press, 1990:485-521.
  45. Kavaliers M, Colwell DD. Sex differences in opioid and non-opioid mediated predator-induced analgesia in mice. Brain Res 1991;568:173-177.
  46. Kellstein DE, Mayer DJ. Spinal co-administration of cholecystokinin antagonists with morphine prevents the development of opioid tolerance. Pain 1991;47:221-229.
  47. Kelly DD. Stress-induced analgesia. Ann NY Acad Sci 1986;467.
  48. Kest B, Marek P, Liebeskind JC. The specific N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist blocks U-50,488, but not morphine antinociception. Brain Res (in press).
  49. Kim JJ, DeCola JP, Landeira-Fernandez J, Fanselow MS. N -methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist APV blocks acquisition but not expression of fear conditioning. Behav Neurosci 1991;105:126-133.
  50. Klee WA, Streaty RA. Narcotic receptor sites in morphine-dependent rats. Nature 1974;248:61-63.
  51. Lander ES, Botstein D. Mapping mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. Genetics 1989;121:185-199.
  52. Lasagna L, Beecher HK. The optimal dose of morphine. JAMA 1954;156:230-234.
  53. Lewis JW, Cannon JT, Liebeskind JC. Opioid and non-opioid mechanisms of stress analgesia. Science 1980;208:623-625.
  54. Lewis JW, Shavit Y, Terman GW, Gale RP, Liebeskind JC. Stress and morphine affect survival of rats challenged with a mammary ascites tumor (MAT 13762B). Nat Immun Cell Growth Regul 1983;3:43-50.
  55. Lewis JW, Shavit Y, Terman GW, Nelson LR, Gale RP, Liebeskind JC. Apparent involvement of opioid peptides in stress-induced enhancement of tumor growth. Peptides 1983;4:635-638.
  56. Liebeskind JC. Pain can kill. Pain 1991;44:3-4.
  57. Liebeskind JC, Giesler GJ Jr, Urca G. Evidence pertaining to an endogenous mechanism of pain inhibition in the central nervous system. In: Zotterman Y, ed. Sensory functions of the skin in primates. New York: Pergamon Press, 1976:561-574.
  58. Lipa SM, Kavaliers M. Sex differences in the inhibitory effects of the NMDA antagonist, MK-801, on morphine and stress-induced analgesia. Brain Res Bull 1990;24:627-630.
  59. Macrae JR, Scoles MT, Siegel S. The contribution of pavlovian conditioning to drug tolerance and dependence. Br J Addict 1987;82:371-380.
  60. Marek P, Ben-Eliyahu S, Gold M, Liebeskind JC. Excitatory amino acid antagonists (kynurenic acid and MK-801) attenuate the development of morphine tolerance in the rat. Brain Res 1991;547:77-81.
  61. Marek P, Ben-Eliyahu S, Vaccarino AL, Liebeskind JC. Delayed application of MK-801 attenuates development of morphine tolerance in rats. Brain Res 1991;558:163-165.
  62. Marek P, Mogil JS, Sternberg WF, Panocka I, Liebeskind JC. N -methyl-D-aspartate acid (NMDA) receptor antagonist MK-801 blocks non-opioid stress-induced analgesia. II. Comparison across three swim stress paradigms in selectively bred mice. Brain Res 1992;578:197-203.
  63. Marek P, Page GG, Ben-Eliyahu S, Liebeskind JC. NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801 blocks non-opioid stress-induced analgesia. I. Comparison of opiate receptor-deficient and opiate receptor-rich strains of mice. Brain Res 1991;551:293-296.
  64. Marek P, Yirmiya R, Liebeskind JC. Strain differences in the magnitude of swimming-induced analgesia in mice correlate with brain opiate receptor concentration. Brain Res 1988;447:188-190.
  65. Marek P, Yirmiya R, Liebeskind JC. Genetic influences on brain stimulation-produced analgesia in mice: II. Correlation with brain opiate receptor concentration. Brain Res 1990;507: 155-157.
  66. Marek P, Yirmiya R, Panocka I, Liebeskind JC. Genetic influences on brain stimulation-produced analgesia in mice: I. Correlation with stress-induced analgesia. Brain Res 1989;489:182-184.
  67. Martin FC, Shavit Y, Terman GW, Pechnick RN, Oh C, Liebeskind JC. Stereospecificity of opiate immunosuppression in rats. Soc Neurosci Abstr 1985;11:860.
  68. Mayer DJ, Hayes RL. Stimulation produced analgesia: development of tolerance and cross-tolerance to morphine. Science 1975;188:941-943.
  69. Mayer DJ, Wolfle TL, Akil H, Carder B, Liebeskind JC. Analgesia from electrical stimulation in the brainstem of the rat. Science 1971;174:1351-1354.
  70. Miczek KA, Thompson ML, Shuster L. Opioid-like analgesia in defeated mice. Science 1982;215:1520-1522.
  71. Millan MJ. k-Opioid receptors and analgesia. Trends Pharmacol Sci 1990;11:70-76.
  72. Mogil JS, Marek P, Sternberg WF, Spence MA, Liebeskind JC. A genetic analysis of swim stress-induced analgesia in selectively bred mice. Soc Neurosci Abstr 1992;18:686.
  73. Mogil JS, Marek P, Yirmiya R, et al. Antagonism of the non-opioid component of ethanol-induced analgesia by the NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801. Brain Res 1993;602:126-130.
  74. Mogil JS, Sternberg WF, Kest B, Marek P, Liebeskind JC. Sex differences in the antagonism of swim stress-induced analgesia: effects of gonadectomy and estrogen replacement. Pain (in press).
  75. Monaghan DT, Bridges RJ, Cotman CW. The excitatory amino acid receptors: their classes, pharmacology, and distinct properties in the function of the central nervous system. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 1989;29:365-402.
  76. Morgan MM, Sohn J-H, Liebeskind JC. Stimulation of the periaqueductal gray matter inhibits nociception at the supraspinal as well as spinal level. Brain Res 1989;502:61-66.
  77. Moskowitz AS, Terman GW, Carter KR, Morgan MJ, Liebeskind JC. Analgesic, locomotor and lethal effects of morphine in the mouse: strain comparisons. Brain Res 1985;361:46-51.
  78. Moskowitz AS, Terman GW, Liebeskind JC. Stress-induced analgesia in the mouse: strain comparisons. Pain 1985;23:67-72.
  79. O'Connor P, Chipkin RE. Comparisons between warm and cold water swim stress in mice. Life Sci 1984;35:631-639.
  80. Oliverio A, Castellano C, Eleftheriou BE. Morphine sensitivity and tolerance: a genetic investigation in the mouse. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1975;42:219-224.
  81. Page GG. The impact of surgery on natural killer cell cytotoxicity and tumor metastasis in rats. Los Angeles, CA: Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA, 1992.
  82. Panerai AE, Rovati LC, Cocco E, Sacerdote P, Mantegazza P. Dissociation of tolerance and dependence to morphine: a possible role for cholecystokinin. Brain Res 1987;410:52-60.
  83. Panocka I, Marek P, Sadowski B. Inheritance of stress-induced analgesia in mice. Selective breeding study. Brain Res 1986;397:152-155.
  84. Panocka I, Marek P, Sadowski B. Differentiation of neurochemical basis of stress-induced analgesia in mice by selective breeding. Brain Res 1986;397:156-160.
  85. Peets JM, Pomeranz B. CXBK mice deficient in opiate receptors show poor electroacupuncture analgesia. Nature 1978;273:675-676.
  86. Pert CB, Snyder SH. Opiate receptor: demonstration in nervous tissue. Science 1973;179:1011-1013.
  87. Raigorodsky G, Urca G. Intrathecal N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) activates both nociceptive and antinociceptive systems. Brain Res 1987;422:158-162.
  88. Rasmussen K, Krystal JH, Aghajanian GK. Excitatory amino acids and morphine withdrawal: differential effects of central and peripheral kynurenic acid administration. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1991;105:508-512.
  89. Reynolds DV. Surgery in the rat during electrical analgesia induced by focal brain stimulation. Science 1969;164:444-445.
  90. Roberts RC. Current perspectives on selective breeding: theoretical aspects. In: McClearn GE, Deitrich RA, Erwin VG, eds. Development of animal models as pharmacogenetic tools (USDHHS-NIAAA research monograph no. 6). Washington, DC: USGPO, 1981:37-58.
  91. Rodgers RJ, Shepherd JK. 5-HTA agonist, 8-hydroxy-2-(DI-n -propylamino)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT), inhibits non-opioid analgesia in defeated mice: influence of route of administration. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1989;97:163-165.
  92. Rodgers RJ, Shepherd JK, Randall JI. Highly potent inhibitory effects of 5-HT receptor antagonist, GR38032F, on non-opioid defeat analgesia in male mice. Neuropharmacology 1990;29:17-23.
  93. Rosecrans JA, Chance WT. Emotionally induced antinociception. Soc Neurosci Abstr 1976;2:919.
  94. Rothman SM, Olney JW. Excitotoxicity and the NMDA receptor. Trends Neurosci 1987;10:299-302.
  95. Shavit Y, Depaulis A, Martin FC, et al. Involvement of brain opiate receptors in the immune-suppressive effects of morphine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1986;83:7114-7117.
  96. Shavit Y, Lewis JW, Terman GW, Gale RP, Liebeskind JC. Opioid peptides mediate the suppressive effect of stress on natural killer cell cytotoxicity. Science 1984;223:188-190.
  97. Shavit Y, Martin FC, Yirmiya R, et al. Effects of a single administration of morphine or footshock stress on natural killer cell cytotoxicity. Brain Behav Immun 1987;1:318-328.
  98. Shuster L. A pharmacogenetic approach to the brain. In: Lieblich I, ed. Genetics of the brain. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1982:157-173.
  99. Siegel S. State dependent learning and morphine tolerance. Behav Neurosci 1988;102:228-232.
  100. Siegfried B, Nunes de Sousa RL. NMDA receptor blockade in the periaqueductal gray prevents stress-induced analgesia in attacked mice. Eur J Pharmacol 1989;168:239-242.
  101. Suzuki TM, Narita M, Misawa M, Nagase H. Interaction between m and l receptors in pharmacological effects of tolerance to and dependence on several opioids. J Pharmacobiodyn 1990;13:133.
  102. Takahashi M, Okada T, Kaneto H. Differential roles of the adrenal gland in the suppression of morphine antinociceptive tolerance development by a- and b-adrenergic blockers. Jpn J Pharmacol 1991;55:555-558.
  103. Tang J, Chou J, Iadarola M, Yang H-YT, Costa E. Proglumide prevents and curtails acute tolerance to morphine in rats. Neuropharmacology 1984;23:715-718.
  104. Terman GW, Morgan MJ, Liebeskind JC. Opioid and non-opioid stress analgesia from cold water swim: importance of stress severity. Brain Res 1986;372:167-171.
  105. Terman GW, Penner ER, Liebeskind JC. Stimulation-produced and stress-induced analgesia: cross-tolerance between opioid forms. Brain Res 1985;360:374-378.
  106. Terman GW, Shavit Y, Lewis JW, Cannon JT, Liebeskind JC. Intrinsic mechanisms of pain inhibition: activation by stress. Science 1984;226:1270-1277.
  107. Tokuyama S, Takahashi M, Kaneto H. Blockade of the development of analgesic tolerance to morphine by psychological stress through benzodiazepine receptor mediated mechanisms. Jpn J Pharmacol 1989;51:425-427.
  108. Tolman EC. The inheritance of maze-learning ability in rats. J Comp Psychol 1924;4:1-5.
  109. Trujillo KA, Akil H. Inhibition of morphine tolerance and dependence by the NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801. Science 1991;251:85-87.
  110. Trujillo KA, Akil H. Opiate tolerance and dependence: recent findings and synthesis. New Biol 1991;3:915-923.
  111. Vaccarino AL, Marek P, Sternberg WF, Liebeskind JC. NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801 blocks non-opioid stress-induced analgesia in the formalin test. Pain 1992;50:119-123.
  112. Von Voigtlander PF, Lahti RA, Ludens JH. U-50,488: a selective and structurally novel non-mu (m) opioid agonist. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1983;224:7-12.
  113. Watkins LR, Kinscheck IB, Mayer DJ. Potentiation of opiate analgesia and apparent reversal of morphine tolerance by proglumide. Science 1984;224:395-396.
  114. Watkins LR, Mayer DJ. Multiple endogenous opiate and non-opiate analgesia systems: evidence of their existence and clinical implications. Ann NY Acad Sci 1986;467:273-299.
  115. Welch SP, Olson KG, Stevens DL, Dewey WL. Modulation of synaptosomal free intracellular calcium in naive and morphine-tolerant mice: correlation of calcium modulation in vitro and in vivo to tolerance development. In: Harris LS, ed. Problems of drug dependence 1989 (PHS-NIDA research monograph no. 95). Rockville, MD: USGPO, 1990:552-553.
  116. Wiklund L, Behzadi G, Kalen P, et al. Autoradiographic and electrophysiological evidence for excitatory amino acid transmission in the periaqueductal gray projection to the nucleus raphe magnus in the rat. Neurosci Lett 1988;93:158-163.
  117. Woolf CJ, Thompson SWN. The induction and maintenance of central sensitization is dependent on N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor activation: implications for the treatment of postinjury pain hypersensitivity states. Brain Res 1991;44:293-300.
  118. Xu Q, Takahashi M, Kaneto H. Dependency on the brain function of arginine vasopressin system of the development to and recovery from analgesic tolerance to morphine. Brain Res 1991;577:189-193.
  119. Yamamoto T, Ohno M, Ueki S. A selective k-opioid agonist, U-50,488H, blocks the development of tolerance to morphine analgesia in rats. Eur J Pharmacol 1992;156:173.
  120. Zivin JA, Choi DW. Stroke therapy. Sci Am 1991;265:56-63.